Checked 2026-10-15
How we compare plans
Every cell is filled. A number is either sourced and dated, or it's an estimateest. with its method one hover away.
1. Price tiers
Plans are grouped by monthly list price in USD for one individual seat on monthly billing: Free, ~$8–10, ~$20, ~$30–40, ~$50–80, ~$100 and ~$130–200. Team-only plans (Augment Business, Windsurf Teams) are marked as such. Gemini Code Assist Enterprise ($54/mo, no longer sold) and the Alibaba Token Plan appear only on /plans or not at all. Non-USD plans (Kimi's China pricing) use the vendor's international USD price.
2. Verified vs estimated
Verified means the number appears on the vendor's pricing page, docs or help center, or on a public benchmark leaderboard, checked on the date shown. Estimated (dotted underline, est., orange on /value) covers everything else. Each estimate carries a tooltip that names its sources and derivation. We use these kinds of estimates, in order of preference:
- Vendor statements outside the pricing page: staff posts on X (OpenAI's Codex lead: Pro 100 = 5x Plus, Pro 200 = 10x), archived help pages (Anthropic's 2025 prompt counts via archive.ph), earlier vendor tables (Windsurf's March 2026 messages-per-day table).
- Third-party captures of vendor pages: MiniMax call counts (iadecider.com, Sept 23), Z.ai Pro/Max prices (AI Compare Ninja), Amp's included usage (pricing trackers), Factory's earlier 20M-token allowance.
- Community measurements: Antigravity Pro (~8 Opus prompts per 5h, ~24 a week, Reddit) and Cursor (one user's ~$200 of API-priced tokens from a legacy $20 plan). These are low-confidence, and we say so.
- Closest-model proxies for benchmarks: when a plan's model isn't on a leaderboard, we show the score of the nearest benchmarked model and state which direction it likely errs (e.g. Kimi K3 for K2.7 Code is an upper bound; Opus 4.8 for Sonnet 4.5).
We never fill a cell with a number that no source supports. Where even an estimate isn't defensible (Windsurf Free, Cursor Free, Antigravity Free quotas), the cell says what is known, e.g. "free · unquantified", with the vendor's own words in the tooltip.
3. Included usage
Each limit is shown in the vendor's own unit: 5-hour windows, weekly pools, daily request caps, credits or $ allowances. Dollar-credit plans (Copilot, Warp, JetBrains, Zed, Augment, Amp, Kiro) state their credit amount in Included usage. Their value per $1 appears in the Real value column, after any fees or markups (Zed +10%, Augment's 40% LLM fee; Kiro credits are priced at its $0.04 add-on rate, est.). We no longer show a separate "$ credits per $1" column.
4. Best model included
This is the strongest model the plan includes without extra pay-as-you-go spending. * Anthropic's plan page names "Opus"/"Sonnet" without versions, so we assume the latest (5.5). Where versions weren't stated before, we looked them up:
- Cursor Free: Cursor's first-party Grok models only (docs).
- Windsurf/Devin Desktop: paid plans have "full model availability" and recommend Fusion (Opus 5.5 lead); Free has limited models plus free in-house SWE models (docs).
- Gemini Code Assist: Gemini 3.5 Flash is the GA default (docs).
- Codex Free/Go: GPT-6 Luna in the desktop app.
- Antigravity: per-plan model table (docs).
- Kimi: K2.7 Code by default, K3 on higher tiers. The tier mapping uses legacy plan names, so it's marked est.
Cursor's paid pools cover Grok 4.7/4.6/4.5 and Composer 2.5. Other providers' models are on-demand at API price (Premium and up).
5. Benchmarks
- Terminal-Bench 4.0, Vals AI (same Mini-SWE-agent harness for every model), updated 2026-10-13. Scores used: Claude Opus 5.5 65.15% · Claude Sonnet 5.5 64.14% · GPT-6 Astra 59.6% · Claude Fable 5.1 58.08% · Gemini 4 Argon 57.58% · Claude Opus 5 53.53% · Grok 4.7 28.79% · Grok 4.6 17.17% · GPT-6.1 Sol 55.05% · GLM 5.3 38.89% · Qwen 3.8 Max 34.34% · Gemini 3.8 Flash 19.7% · Kimi K3 17.17% · GPT-6 Luna 13.64% · Gemini 3.5 Flash 6.06% · MiniMax-M3 1.01% · Claude Opus 4.8 23.23%.
- Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5, Artificial Analysis (avg of DeepSWE v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SWE-Atlas-QnA; scores are agent+model configs). Snapshot 2026-10-15 (snapshot via BenchLM mirror) via BenchLM's mirror. Scores used: Claude Code + Sonnet 5.5 (max) 68.4 · Claude Code + Opus 5.5 (max) 66 · Antigravity CLI + Gemini 4 Argon (high) 63.8 · Codex + GPT-6 Astra (max) 61.6 · Codex + GPT-6 Luna (max) 41.1 · Grok Build + Grok 4.7 (xhigh) 56.3 · Codex + GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh) 62.9 · Devin Fusion CLI + Opus 5.5 Max + GPT-6 Luna High 68.1 · Claude Code + Opus 5 (max) 59.7 · OpenCode + GLM-5.3 (max) 53.6 · Kimi Code CLI + Kimi K3 51.9 · Claude Code + Qwen3.8 Max 43.3 · Antigravity SDK + Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) 41.9. AA scores an agent + model pair. The score counts as verified when the plan includes that exact agent (Claude Code, Codex, Grok Build, Kimi Code CLI, OpenCode for GLM, Antigravity CLI). For other products (Copilot, Kiro, Warp, JetBrains, Zed, Factory, Augment) we show the best AA score for the same model in another harness, marked est.
- Not used: SWE-bench Verified is saturated at 95–97% and is missing the newest models.
6. Winners
Within each tier, a solid green ★ goes to the best verified value in each column: lowest price, highest benchmark score, and highest conservative Real value multiplier. If an estimate beats every verified value, it also gets a dashed ★ est., so you see both the safe pick and the probable best. Text-only cells never win. A column needs at least two numbers and no full tie.
7. Real value
API-equivalent $ per month ÷ price, with a calculator and per-plan derivations at /value.
8. Corrections
Our monitor re-checks every source page daily, now covering 18 vendors. Measured a cap yourself? Tell us, and we'll replace estimates with data.